Legal Opinion

Prince v. Ypsilanti Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1929No. 18695PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIPPENDAPPER, C.

This is an action brought by defendant in error against Paul Prince, county treasurer, plaintiff in error, to procure a writ of mandamus requiring and directing the defendant, as county treasurer, to reinstate certain paving assessments upon the tax rolls of Lincoln county.

Upon an amended petition filed in the district court an alternative writ was issued. An answer was filed and the cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, resulting in a judgment making the alternative writ peremptory. Defendant, after unsuccessful motion for new trial, brings this appeal.

The record…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Moore v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  3. Nelson v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Perryman v. City Home BuildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. O'Connell v. SanfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hann v. City of Clinton, Okl. Ex Rel. SchuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Versluis v. Town of Haskell, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. Independent School Dist. No. 39 of Creek County v. Exchange National Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. McGrath v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Davis v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API