Legal Opinion

Perryman v. City Home Builders

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1926No. 16670PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L~ISTER, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.

The plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant to purchase two town lots in Oklahoma City, which agreement provided that the deenclant was to deliver to the plaintiff an abstract showing "an absolute and perfect title in fee simple to said lands"; and that if the abstract failed to disclose such title, plaintiff should be entitled to the immediate return of the $500 constituting the initial ~ayment on the liur-chase price. The abstract…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  5. Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Hann v. City of Clinton, Okl. Ex Rel. SchuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  3. Versluis v. Town of Haskell, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. McGrath v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Davis v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API