Warner Associates v. Logan
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The plaintiff, Warner Associates, appeals from the judgment in favor of the defendants Mariylyn Logan and John Logan after trial before the court. The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly found that the parties did not enter into an additional five year lease term.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. The defendants entered into a written commercial lease with the predecessor in title to the plaintiff covering a detached garage on the premises at 34 Franklin Street in West-port. The defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Hatcho Corp. v. Della PietraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Dainty Rubbish Service, Inc. v. Beacon Hill Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Lampson Lumber Co. v. CaporaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Boulevard Associates v. Sovereign Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Regency Savings Bank v. Westmark PartnersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Hawley Avenue Associates, LLC v. Robert D. Russo, M.D. & Associates Radiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Enfield Pizza Palace, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Greater New YorkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- United Social & Mental Health Services, Inc. v. RodowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.