Lampson Lumber Co. v. Caporale
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtQursrLAN, J.
This appeal involves the question whether a restrictive covenant in a warranty deed from the plaintiff to the named defendant is unreasonable and unenforceable. From a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiff has appealed.
The deed contained the following restriction: “Grantee agrees that this conveyance is made upon the understanding that the above described premises will not be used as a motor vehicle junk yard nor for the sales of used cars or parts nor for any other occupation usually deemed unwholesome, noxious or offensive and further, during such time as the Grantor or its successors…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hodge v. . SloanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Samuel Stores, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Armstrong v. LeveroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Beit v. BeitSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Mattis v. LallySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hatcho Corp. v. Della PietraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. LevitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Dennen v. SearleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Arway v. BloomConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.