Legal Opinion
Regency Savings Bank v. Westmark Partners
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 1, 2000No. AC 19683PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiff, Regency Savings Bank, appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the defendants’1 objection to a motion for deficiency judgment arising out of a mortgage foreclosure action. The plaintiff contends that the court improperly concluded that certain defendants2 were not liable for any portion of the deficiency pursuant to a guarantee agreement. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. On June 30,1987, CGI Danbury Associates Limited Partner*162ship (CGI) executed a $3.5 million promissory note to Society…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam SinghCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Superior Wire & Paper Products, Ltd. v. Talcott Tool & Machine, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Garofalo v. SquillanteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Milford Bank v. Phoenix Contracting Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Vaccaro v. Shell Beach Condominium, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- JSA Financial Corp. v. Quality Kitchen Corp. of DelawareConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Regency Savings Bank v. Westmark PartnersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.