Legal Opinion
Dainty Rubbish Service, Inc. v. Beacon Hill Ass'n
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 17, 1993No. 11619PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is a breach of contract action in which the plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant rendered after a trial to the court. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) construed the contract as being terminable at any time upon the giving of sixty days notice, (2) found that the defendant terminated the contract in a timely fashion, (3) found that the contract was a contract of adhesion, (4) applied the theory of estoppel, (5) found the contract to be unenforceable due to mutual mistake, and (6) found that the plaintiff failed to mitigate his damages. We reverse the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hatcho Corp. v. Della PietraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Shawmut Bank Connecticut v. Connecticut Limousine Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- BRJM, LLC v. Output Systems, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. Avon Meadow AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Patron v. KonoverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Venture Partners, Ltd. v. Synapse Technologies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.