Legal Opinion

George v. Weston

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1938No. Civ. 2207PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

This action is prosecuted on the part of the plaintiff and appellant to obtain specific performance of what is described as “Agreement to Lease for Oil and Gas”. The instrument involved is unilateral in form, being signed by the defendant but not the plaintiff and, except for the property described and an attached notarial acknowledgment is in words and figures following:

‘ ‘ Agreement to Lease for Oil and Gas.

“I, the undersigned, for and in consideration of $100.00 to me in hand paid, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, do give and grant unto James P. George, his heirs…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. John P. Mills OrganizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Schaake v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  5. White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Vanzandt v. HeilmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Kennecott Corp. v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Alfson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Scheel v. HarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API