Kennecott Corp. v. Union Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTLER, J.
—The Imperial Irrigation District (IID) owns land in the Imperial Valley underlying which are mineral deposits and geothermal formations capable of producing steam convertible into electric energy. IID as lessor leased 280 acres of such land to a lessee for production of steam and minerals. The lessee assigned the leasehold interest to Imperial Thermal Products (ITP). ITP then assigned to Southern Pacific Land Company (Southern) its rights to produce steam from the land and to dispose of the wastes from such production. Southern later assigned those rights such that Union Oil…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Oceanside 84, Ltd. v. Fidelity Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Hernandez v. Badger Construction Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CO. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Gas v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.