Vanzandt v. Heilman
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Chief Justice.
The question is whether a contract to execute and deliver an oil lease, generally known as “Producer’s 88 Lease,” is void for lack} of mutuality. The trial court made findings of fact which are accepted by both parties as the facts in the case, leaving only the question of law stated at the beginning of this opinion.
The findings of fact and conclusions of law are in substance as follows:
The defendant, E. C. Heilman, on the 29th day of April, 1948, was the owner of the following described real estate, to-wit: All of the coal, oil, gas and other minerals in and under ■ and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Epstein v. . GluckinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Corsicana Petroleum Co. v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Brown v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Robert M. McKinney v. Gannett Co., Inc., and the New Mexican, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Torgeson v. ConnellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Harmon v. Tanner Motor Tours of Nevada, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Hydro Resources Corp. v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Board of Education, Gadsden Independent School Dist. No. 16 v. James Hamilton Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.