Legal Opinion

Keeter v. Town of Lake Lure

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1965No. 41PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Plaintiff has no exception to the judge’s findings of fact. Consequently, the judge’s findings of fact are presumed to be supported by competent evidence, and are binding on appeal. Insurance Co. v. Trucking Co., 256 N.C. 721, 125 S.E. 2d 25.

Plaintiff has four assignments of error. lie first assigns as error the denial of his written request by Judge Froneberger to make conclusions of law based upon his findings of fact to the following effect: (1) The proposed issuance of $390,000 of revenue producing bonds by the town of Lake Lure to purchase the properties of Carolina Mountain Power…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Fawcett v. Town of Mt. AirySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Britt v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Brockenbrough v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Briggs v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Stanley v. Department of Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. North Carolina Turnpike Authority v. Pine Island, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API