Legal Opinion

Britt v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1952No. 593PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

The record before us generates some doubt as to whether this action is a bona fide adversary proceeding. While plaintiff alleges that the parking facilities the defendant proposes to furnish motorists are not “for a proper public purpose or for the general welfare and benefit of the City and its inhabitants, but are for the private benefit of the users of such facilities,” he stipulates in part that traffic congestion on the streets of Wilmington has reached the point that it creates a public nuisance and “this traffic congestion is not capable of being adequately abated except by provision…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Williamson v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Nash v. . TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Data General Corp. v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Evans v. Housing Auth. of City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Estate of Williams ex rel. Overton v. Pasquotank County Parks & Recreation DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API