Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Department of Conservation & Development

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1973No. 80, 81, 82PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

The first question we consider is whether the petitioners, as taxpayers, have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Act.

The Halifax, Jones, and Northampton Authorities have not spent — nor do they contemplate spending — any funds derived from taxation. As yet they have issued no bonds. However, they were created solely for the purpose of issuing tax-exempt revenue bonds to finance the projects specified in the Act and, if— and when — there is a “successful resolution” of the constitutional questions with respect to their power to issue such bonds, they propose to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Price v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Wells v. Housing Authority of the City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Mangum v. Raleigh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Southern Valley Grain Dealers Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Dunn v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API