Legal Opinion

Fawcett v. Town of Mt. Airy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1903PublishedCited by 81 opinions

ActioN by Thomas Fawcett and others against the town of Mount Airy, heard by Judge T. A. McNeill at November Term, 1903, of the Superior Cburt of Slurry County.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgoMeby, J.

Whether a city or town has the right to incur an indebtedness for the erection and operation of plants for the supply of water and electric lights for municipal use and to sell to its inhabitants is a necessary municipal * expense, is the question again presented to us for decision. Indebtedness incurred by a city or town for a supply of water stands on the same footing as indebtedness incurred for lighting purposes, and if such indebtedness be a necessary expense, then whether or not a municipality may incur it, does not depend upon the approval of the proposition by a majority of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayo v. Commissioners of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Lott v. Mayor of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Roberts v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Keith v. . LockhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API