Legal Opinion

OSUMI v. Sutton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 2007No. B191204PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, Acting P. J.

Strong public policy in favor of the settlement of civil cases gives the trial court, which approves the settlement, the power to enforce it. In ruling on a motion to enforce settlement, it necessarily has the power to resolve factual disputes relating to the agreement. Here, for example, it has the power to extend the deadline for performance in favor of a party who is not at fault and against a party who is at fault.

Michael Osumi (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s orders granting Bill Sutton’s (Respondent) motion to enforce their settlement agreement,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Terry v. ConlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Petropoulos v. PetropoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Mason & Dixon Intermodal v. Lapmaster International LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC v. HernandezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Lesnik v. Eisenmann SEDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Pearson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Hines v. LukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API