Legal Opinion

Evans v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1939No. S. F. 16245; S. F. 16268PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*566THE COURT.

Petitioner, the Building and Loan Commissioner of this state, filed an original proceeding in this court (S. F. No. 16245) seeking a writ of prohibition and a writ of mandate directed to the respondent Superior Court. Respondents filed a demurrer and an answer to the petition but the material facts, for the purpose of this discussion, do not appear to be in dispute.

Pacific States Savings and Loan Company, hereinafter referred to as the “association”, was organized in this state and was doing business under the Building and Loan Association Act. (Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 986,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Rodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API