Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Donahue

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 2010No. G040628, G041503PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

In separate orders, the trial court charged a trust with some $5 million in past and ongoing attorney fees incurred on behalf of a former trustee in defending against the beneficiary’s allegations of self-dealing and conflict of interest. Eight attorneys from three major law firms comprised the former trustee’s legal team, with four to five of those attorneys simultaneously appearing at the 14-day court trial.

We reverse the fee awards. While trustees are properly reimbursed for reasonable attorney fees to defend adverse claims against the trust, we cannot determine from the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Christian Research Institute v. AlnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Glenn Tibble v. Edison InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Concepcion v. Amscan Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Julian Union Elementary Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Mountjoy v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Trolan v. Trolan, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API