Legal Opinion

State v. Lopez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 25, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 92-0971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

Kenneth Douglas Lopez (“defendant”) appeals the manner in which the trial court ordered him to pay fines and costs of prosecution. Because we find that the order to pay 25% of defendant’s net income is a “specified installment” within the trial court’s statutory power, we partially affirm the trial court’s sentence. Because the trial court failed to make necessary specific findings as to imposition of “costs of prosecution,” we remand for further findings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pled guilty to possession of marijuana having a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. OehlerkingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. State v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Espinoza v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State v. AlbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. Torres-SotoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. State of Arizona v. Luis Alberto Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API