Legal Opinion

State v. Torres-Soto

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 21, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0323PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Presiding Judge.

Enrique Torres-Soto (“Appellant”), an indigent, was sentenced following conviction of a drug offense, and he appealed. His counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297, 451 P.2d 878 (1969), stating that he had searched the record and found no arguable question of law. We ordered supplemental briefing on the legality of Appellant’s fine, fees and surcharges. We affirm the conviction and the sentence, as modified by vacating the orders assessing Appellant $85,500…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. GuerraArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State v. BeltranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State of Arizona v. Luis Alberto Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. State v. BeuclerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API