Legal Opinion
State v. Miller
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1975No. 3141, 3142PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
This court has jurisdiction of the instant cases pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S. Thomas Walter Cade and Gregory David Miller have each appealed from the judgments entered against them. Each raises identical issues in identical briefs and we have therefore ordered their appeals to be consolidated by this court.
Cade and Miller were arrested and charged with the possession of marijuana. A.R.S. § 36-1002.05. They were determined to be indigent by the trial judge and counsel was appointed to represent them. Subsequently, the defendants pleaded guilty…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. OehlerkingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Armstead v. DaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Espinoza v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.