Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 28, 2007No. 1 CA-CR 06-0193 PRPC, 1 CA-CR 06-0194 PRPCPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner George Taylor (“Taylor”) seeks review of the trial court’s orders summarily dismissing his petitions for post-conviction relief. For the reasons set forth below, we grant review and grant relief. In this opinion we hold that “financial resources,” as used in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 11-584(C) (Supp.2006) and Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure 6.4(b) and 6.7(d), does not include Taylor’s “imputed income.” We also reiterate that before a court can order an indigent defendant to pay to offset the cost of legal services, the court must make…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State v. BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Antonio P. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. State v. HindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State of Arizona v. Adolfo Noel Ruiz, Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API