Legal Opinion

State v. Albert

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1995No. S-5754PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

In Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), the United States Supreme Court held that in state criminal prosecutions “counsel must be provided for defendants unable to employ counsel” because of indigency. 372 U.S. at 340, 83 S.Ct. at 794. Gideon, however, did not address the subject of whether states could attempt to recover from indigent defendants some of the costs of providing counsel to them. Currently, all states and the federal government have some type of cost recoupment system. 1 Consolidated cases presently before this court…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Jordan v. JordanAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API