Legal Opinion

Brown v. Rouse

California Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1897No. S. F. No. 773PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application in the Supreme Court for supersedeas to stay execution upon a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. W. Gr. Lorrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is a motion for supersedeas, based upon the following facts: The defendants appealed from a money judgment, and in due time filed a stay bond in sufficient amount and proper form. On November 24, 1896, plaintiff excepted to the sufficiency of the sureties> and defendants gave notice that they would justify before the county clerk on December 4th, at 11 o’clock^ A. m. At that day and hour the plaintiff attended before the clerk, but neither the defendant nor her sureties appeared. On the same day, December 4,1896, the defendant’s attorney, who resided and had his office in San Francisco,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. KrempelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Perry v. Angelus Hospital AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. McAneny v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cooper v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API