First National Bank v. Nason
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. W. L. Pierce, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal of its action for want of prosecution.
The action was brought May 28, 1892, to recover three thousand five hundred dollars and interest on a promissory note made by defendant April 3, 1888, payable sixty days after date. Summons issued April 20, 1893, and was served January 4, 1894. Defendant filed his answer February 7, 1894, which, if true, constituted a defense ta the action. August 7, 1895, defendant moved to dismiss the action, and the motion was granted August 16, 1895.
From the foregoing statement it appears that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grigsby v. Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Kreiss v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kubli v. HawkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Simmons v. KellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Cowell v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Johnston v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Harris v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Jepsen v. SherryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Ordway v. ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.