Legal Opinion

Hammond v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1941No. Civil No. 4231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc., a corporation, called the company, brought suit against C. P. Hammond to recover attorney’s fees incurred by it in defending a certain action in a previous suit in which the position of the parties as plaintiff and defendant was reversed. Reference to this previous suit will be made from time to time as is necessary.

The facts leading up to the present action are not in dispute, and may be stated as follows: In 1937 both the company and Hammond were engaged in the grocery business in Phoenix. In the spring of that year the legislature had enacted chapter 44 of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Elconin v. YalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fagerberg v. Phoenix Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Enyart v. OrrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Jacobson v. Laurel Canyon Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Podol v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. RalstonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. Book-Cellar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. ABC Supply, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API