Legal Opinion

Podol v. Jacobs

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1946No. 4837PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Judge.

Appellants were defendants and appellee was plaintiff in the lower court. The facts, proceedings and issues may be stated briefly as follows:

Pauline Podol leased as her separate property to the plaintiff certain store premises for a term expiring January 4, 1945. The following provision appeared in the lease: “Lessee also has an option for three additional years for the rent of $125.00 per month for the first year and $135.00 for the additional two years, but must give lessor 90 days written notice before the lease expires of his intention to continue on this option of three…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Bissell v. Spring Valley TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. People v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. General Petroleum Corp. v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API