Legal Opinion

Enyart v. Orr

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 6, 1925No. 10,934PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

The plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court, where defendants in error were plaintiffs. We refer to them hereafter in accordance with the alignment there. Plaintiffs, are law partners, residing and practicing in Colorado Springs, El Paso county. They claimed a balance due them from defendant for legal services, and recovered judgment on a verdict of the jury in the sum of $64,000 and costs. Defendant brings error.

The assignments of error to be noted are: (1) The denial of defendant’s motions for change of venue. (2) The court’s ruling in permitting plaintiffs to amend their…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Butler v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Jackson v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Gottlieb v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1876

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Matter of King Resources Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  2. Olsen and Brown v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Liber v. FlorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. Evans v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Lamar Alfalfa Milling Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API