Cooley v. Brunswig Drug Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence. Judgment in the sum of one thousand dollars went for plaintiff, from which, and an order denying its motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
The sole ground upon which appellant insists upon a reversal is that the findings do not support the judgment, in that the court not only failed to find, either directly or indirectly, that defendant was guilty of negligence, but the findings affirmatively show that the injury complained of was due solely to the gross negligence of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gould v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Schierhold v. North Beach & Mission RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Silveira v. IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Feeney v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Tucker v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Spotton v. DyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Lee v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Coughman v. HarmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.