Silveira v. Iverson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H. Bahrs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
Appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendants did not interpose any demurrer, hut the main point which they now make for a reversal is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
It is averred in the complaint that plaintiff was employed by defendants, who were the owners of a certain coasting schooner called the “Ocean Spray,” to cook on said schooner and to perform such other services as the captain of the vessel might call on him to perform; that “it was the duty of the defendants to provide said schooner with good, safe, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Alpers v. SchamMelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by20 opinions
- Perry v. Angelus Hospital AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Robinet v. HawksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- South v. County of San BenitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Tucker v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Moore v. BurtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.