Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Cooper

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1916No. L. A. No. 3634. Department OnePublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to be due to the negligence of defendant. The case was tried before the court sitting without a jury, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that plaintiff was engaged at the special request of defendant in assisting him in baling hay with a hay-press…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Linnehan v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Barstow v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Bacigalupi v. Phoenix Building & Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Riser v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Silveira v. IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Hollywood CanteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bockrath v. Aldrich Chemical Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Gallagher v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Westervelt v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Bockrath v. Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API