Legal Opinion

Gould v. Eaton

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1896No. L. A. No. 23PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of'the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. W. B. Cope, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The Cold Spring brand) of Montecito creek has its rise in the Santa Inez Mountains, and flows in a southerly direction through a canyon on the southerly slope of said mountains. These mountains in the neighborhood of said stream are composed chiefly of parallel strata of sandstone, extending across the canyon, and separated by seams parallel with the strata, filled with clay which is impervious to water. This sandstone is porous and fissured with seams and cracks, both parallel with the strata and transversely thereto. The trend of the strata is nearly cast and west, and nearly at right…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Southern Pac. R.R. v. DufourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Case v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Monterey S.P. Partnership v. W. L. Bangham, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API