Legal Opinion
James E. Manning v. Norman A. Paradis
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 12, 2002No. 01-1431PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
James E. Manning (“Manning”) appeals from a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) awarding judgment in an interference to the senior party, Norman A. Paradis (“Paradis”). Manning v. Paradis, Inter. No. 104,199 (Bd. Pat.App. & Inter. Feb. 27, 2001). Because the Board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and was not contrary to law, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this interference concerns a method of treating a subject in cardiac arrest. The method includes inserting a catheter through the subject’s femoral artery into…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Peter B. Cooper v. David GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Yoshihiro Fujikawa, Mikio Suzuki, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Mitsuaki Sakashita and Masaki Kitahara v. Sompong Wattanasin, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Estee Lauder Inc. v. L'oreal, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- David M. Rapoport v. William C. Dement, Mark R. Rosekind, and Jeffrey L. SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schumer v. Laboratory Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Barry v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Vizio, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.