Legal Opinion
Vizio, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 26, 2010No. 2009-1386PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Opinion dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Vizio, Inc. and Amtran Technology Company, Ltd. (collectively, “Vizio”), and TPV Technology, Ltd., TPV International, Inc., Top Victory Electronics Company, Ltd., and Envision Peripherals, Inc. (collectively, “TPV”) appeal from the final determination of the International Trade Commission (“Commission”) that the importation and sale of certain digital television products violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337. The Commission…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Guangdong Alison Hi-Tech Co. v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Interdigital Communications, LLC v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.