Legal Opinion

Barry v. Medtronic, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 24, 2019No. 2017-2463PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion dissenting in part filed by Chief Judge PROST.

Taranto, Circuit Judge.

Dr. Mark Barry brought this action against Medtronic, Inc., alleging that Medtronic induced surgeons to infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,670,358 and 8,361,121, which Dr. Barry owns and which name him as the sole inventor. The jury found infringement of method claims 4 and 5 of the '358 patent and system claims 2, 3, and 4 of the '121 patent, rejected Medtronic's several invalidity defenses, and awarded damages. In post-trial rulings on the jury issues, Barry v. Medtronic, Inc. , 230 F.Supp.3d 630 (E.D. Tex. 2017) ( Barry…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Tecsec, Inc. v. Adobe Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  2. Myco Industries, Inc. v. Blephex, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  3. Basf Corporation v. Snf Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  4. United Cannabis Corporation v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
  5. Acufloor, LLC v. Eventile, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2022

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API