Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: VARIOUS POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On February 15, 2008, the Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs’ and defendants’ motions for renewed judgment as a matter of law, plaintiffs’ motions for a new trial, and defendants’ motion for damages and equitable relief. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby DENIES all of plaintiffs’ ■ motions. In addition, the Court DENIES defendants’ renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and DENIES defendants’ motion for retrospective damages. The Court reserves judgment on…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. v. Cooper Cameron Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Kaneka Corp. v. SKC Kolon PI, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Madrigal v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Power-One, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, IncDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.