Legal Opinion

Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 19, 2008No. C 02-00790 SIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: VARIOUS POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

On February 15, 2008, the Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs’ and defendants’ motions for renewed judgment as a matter of law, plaintiffs’ motions for a new trial, and defendants’ motion for damages and equitable relief. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby DENIES all of plaintiffs’ ■ motions. In addition, the Court DENIES defendants’ renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and DENIES defendants’ motion for retrospective damages. The Court reserves judgment on…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. v. Cooper Cameron Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
  2. Kaneka Corp. v. SKC Kolon PI, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. Madrigal v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  4. Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  5. Power-One, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, IncDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API