Legal Opinion

Clair W. & Gladys Judd Family Ltd. Partnership v. Hutchings

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1990No. 860100PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment determining the boundary between its property and defendants’ property to be a longstanding fence line, based on the rule of boundary by acquiescence.

Plaintiff and defendants own adjoining tracts of land in Utah County, with plaintiffs tract lying immediately south of defendants’ tract. The parties have stipulated that the legal descriptions of the two tracts overlap, as much as twenty-one feet at one point. Lying south of both deed lines is a fence line which the trial court found that the parties and their predecessors had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Daniel Boardman and Others, in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M'call and Others, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Staker v. AinsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Brown v. MillinerUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Halladay v. CluffUtah Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Orton v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Van Dyke v. ChappellUtah Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API