Legal Opinion

RHN CORP. v. Veibell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2004No. 20010548PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

BACKGROUND

¶ 1 This case involves two separate boundary disputes between adjacent landowners in Box Elder County. The Veibell family and the Ericksen family have owned adjacent properties in the county since the early 1900s. The parties to this case are J. Alton Veibell (Alton Veibell or Veibell), the successor-in-interest to the Veibell property, and the Leola J. Ericksen Family Limited Partnership (the Partnership), the successor-in-interest to the Ericksen property. The parties have raised claims based on boundary by acquiescence and deed reformation.

I. BOUNDARY BY…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tripp v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Orton v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Staker v. AinsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Christensen & Jensen, P.C. v. Barrett & DainesUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hill v. Estate of AllredUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Keith v. Mountain Resorts Development, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. LysobeySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. Parduhn v. BennettUtah Supreme Court · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API