Legal Opinion

The United States v. Border Brokerage Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 11, 1983No. Appeal 82-15PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the United States from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade determining that certain imported wire rope fittings should have been admitted duty-free as “agricultural .. . implements” rather than. subjected to duty as “articles of iron or steel.” We affirm.

I

Wire rope fittings are used with wire rope as couplings between an object and the rope. The fittings here involved are used in the hauling of cut timber. The wire rope is wrapped around the log, and the fittings are used as couplings to secure the rope to the log. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. United States v. Norman G. Jensen, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. Border Brokerage Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. Miracle Exclusives, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Minnetonka Brands, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. Potter v. HoustonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  4. Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Eastalco Aluminum Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API