Legal Opinion

United States v. Norman G. Jensen, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 10, 1977No. C.A.D. 1183; No. 76-16PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.'

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 76 Cust. Ct. 42, C.D. 4634, 408 F. Supp. 1379 (1976), sustaining appellee’s claim ¿hat its merchandise is entitled to entry free of duty under item 692.30, Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”), instead of being subject to duty under item 692.35, TSUS, as classified. We affirm.

The pertinent statutory provisions are as follows:

PART 6. — TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT

4t $ * * * * *

Subpart B. — Motor Vehicles

Tractors (except tractors in item 692.40 and except automobile .truck trac- , tors), whether or not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Staalkat of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. United States v. Border Brokerage Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. International Spring Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  2. The United States v. Border Brokerage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Potter v. HoustonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API