Legal Opinion

United States v. Border Brokerage Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1972No. 5440, C.A.D. 1058PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BaldwiN, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the Customs Court, First Division, sustaining appellee’s protest concerning the classification of certain plastic planting bullets, used for planting and growing trees. The opinion of the Customs Court, familiarity -with which is assumed, appears at 65 Cust. Ct. 277, C.D. 4089 (1970). The court held that the merchandise qualified for duty-free entry under item 666.00, TSITS, as “agricultural implements not specially provided for.”

After a thorough consideration of appellant’s arguments, we have difficulty with only one aspect of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Norman G. Jensen, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. The United States v. Border Brokerage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  4. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
  5. Miracle Exclusives, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API