Legal Opinion

Eastalco Aluminum Company v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 18, 1990No. 90-1130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Eastalco Aluminum Company (“Eastal-co”) appeals the judgment of the U.S. Court of International Trade holding that certain carbon blocks imported in 1981 “must be classified under item 517.91 as articles of carbon or graphite, a general category” within the Tariff Schedules of the United States (1981) (“TSUS”). Eastalco Aluminum Co. v. United States, 726 P.Supp. 1342, 1343 (Ct.Int’l Trade 1989). We affirm.

I

The articles at issue are blocks used to line an aluminum reduction cell that produces aluminum metal by electrolysis of fused aluminum oxide salts contained in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simod America Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  3. Hasbro Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  4. The United States v. Border Brokerage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eastalco Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  2. Eastalco Aluminum Company, F.W. Myers & Co., Inc., and Intalco Aluminum Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Eastalco Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  4. Marcel Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API