Legal Opinion

United States v. Carborundum Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 17, 1976No. 75-26 C.A.D. 1172PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 74 Cust. Ct. 50, C.D. 4584, 393 F. Supp. 211 (1975), holding that certain iron-silicon alloy powder is classifiable as “ferrosilicon” under item 607.50, TSUS, as contended by the importer, rather than as alloy iron or steel powders, other than stainless steel powders, under item 608.08, TSUS, as originally classified. We reverse.

The Merchandise Imported

The imported merchandise is an iron-silicon alloy powder which contains 75.94 percent iron, and 16.33 percent silicon. It has been *99specially processed in Canada…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. United States (Bruno Scheidt, Inc., Party in Interest)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  3. Maher-App & Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Carborundum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. Benq America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. Aromant Usa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Kyowa Gas Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. E.M. Chemicals v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API