Securities & Exchange Commission v. Levine
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Defendants Gerald and Marie Levine were found by a jury to have violated the following provisions of federal securities law: § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5; §§ 17(a)(1), (2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a); and § 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, id. § 78m(b)(5), and Rule 13b2-l promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.13b2-l. The second amended complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,351 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Chemical Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. EspositoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BankoskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.