U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
This civil-enforcement case brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission has at long last rounded the corner from the liability phase to the remedy phase. In 2011, the SEC accused Mary A. Grace, Tamio Saito, e-Smart Technologies, Inc., Intermarket Ventures Inc., and IVI Smart Technologies, Inc., along with several individual brokers, of violating multiple provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the unlawful sale of e-Smart securities. In three decisions spanning…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gabelli v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Int'l Pension Fund v. Kel-Tech Constr., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. China Infrastructure Investment Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Analytica Bio-Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MahabubDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.