Legal Opinion
Herrig v. Herrig
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1992No. 92-116PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Chief Justice.
Appellants Rodney R. Herrig and Larry G. Bean, as the next friend and guardian of Kelsey Lynn Herrig and Natalie Sue Her-rig, filed a multiple-count complaint against Appellee Farmers Insurance Exchange to recover compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney’s fees and interest, for alleged bad faith settlement practices. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and denied Appellants’ motion to amend the complaint.
We affirm.
The issues we must address are:
1. Whether Appellants may assert a bad faith…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Jenkins v. J. C. Penney Casualty Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.