Legal Opinion

Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of America

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1993No. 92-68, 92-270PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

In these consolidated appeals, we are required to determine which “claims made” professional liability insurer provides coverage when a potential claim is reported to the former insurer but the actual claim is made during the coverage period of the present insurer. The present insurer of a Wyoming physician challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the former insurer. The district court determined that no claim, as defined by the former insurer’s policy, had been made during that company’s applicable coverage period.

We affirm.

I. ISSUES

In Appeal No.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Worthington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Crown Life Ins. Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Helfand v. Nationall Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Board Of County Commissioners For Converse CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brown v. GloverUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Claman v. PoppWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Scherer Construction, LLC v. Hedquist Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API