Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 2005PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the denial of appellant Carl E. Johnson’s first petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. Because we determine that the procedural default of counsel effectively denied appellant a direct appeal, we find that counsel was ineffective. Accordingly, we vacate the PCRA court’s order and remand.

¶ 2 Appellant pled guilty on January 24, 2003 to multiple counts of possession with the intent to deliver a controlled substance, one count of conspiracy, and related charges. The trial court sentenced him to pay a fine,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. LiebelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. MikellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. GrosellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. PulancoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Com v. Benton , J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API