Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grosella

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 2006PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Secundino Grosella purports to appeal nunc pro tunc from his October 22, 2003 judgment of sentence, which was entered in the Court of Common Pleas of York County. 1 Appellant contends (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions and (2) the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him. We conclude the PCRA 2 court erred in reinstating Appellant’s direct appeal rights, and therefore, we reverse and remand to the PCRA court for proceedings consistent with this decision.

¶ 2 The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MikellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Antonio Howard v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Antonio Howard v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Com v. Benton , J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API