Commonwealth v. Grosella
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant Secundino Grosella purports to appeal nunc pro tunc from his October 22, 2003 judgment of sentence, which was entered in the Court of Common Pleas of York County. 1 Appellant contends (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions and (2) the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him. We conclude the PCRA 2 court erred in reinstating Appellant’s direct appeal rights, and therefore, we reverse and remand to the PCRA court for proceedings consistent with this decision.
¶ 2 The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows:…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MikellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Antonio Howard v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2020
- Antonio Howard v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2020
- Com v. Benton , J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.