Commonwealth v. Mikell
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY COLVILLE, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the order dismissing Appellant’s petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). Appellant raises two issues for our review: (1) whether the PCRA court erred in refusing to reinstate Appellant’s direct appeal rights nunc pro tunc; and (2) whether the PCRA court erred in failing to either grant Appellant relief on his petition or conduct an evidentiary hearing thereupon. We affirm.
¶2 Our standard of review is as follows:
Our standard of review of a PCRA court’s denial of a petition for postcon-viction relief is well-settled:…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ReavesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RosadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. Rosado, F., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Acosta, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.