Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lantzy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 1999PublishedCited by 433 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

We allowed appeal to consider Appellant’s request for restoration of his right to file a direct appeal. The case presents the threshold issue of whether relief is available under the Post Conviction Relief Act on a prisoner’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to perfect a direct appeal following a judgment of sentence.

On September 3, 1992, Appellant, Jesse D. Lantzy (“Lantzy”), entered pleas of guilty to theft, receiving stolen property and unauthorized use of an automobile. Thereafter, on July 20, 1993, the trial court imposed an aggregate sentence…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by433 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. PittsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. OusleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

428 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API