Commonwealth v. Pulanco

OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Henry Pulanco, purports to appeal nunc pro tunc from the judgment of sentence entered on August 16, 2004. Upon review of the unique procedural history of this case, we are constrained to vacate the order allowing Appellant to file an amended Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement nunc pro tunc, which in effect, reinstated his direct appeal rights. We remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

¶ 2 A prior panel of this Court summarized the relevant facts of this case in an unpublished memorandum as follows:

On [September 18, 2003], Reading…